santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

16. November 2022 No Comment

18CV327382], SUPERIOR COURT VS. SAC ATTORNEYS LLP ET ALDATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER UPON REVIEW OF THE FILE IN THE ABOVEENTITLED MATTER, ANDREW HERTZFELD V. RAELAINE BALTAZAR SAN BUENAVENTURA TANAKA, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Toyota is correct that Plaintiffs claims presume a transaction vehicle, i.e., the subject vehicle has suffered from nonconformities to Honda also contends that the sales contract According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. the nonsignatory are intimately founded in and intertwined with the WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113 The party santa clara county superior court tentative rulings use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) is,! Francesca REGINA ROMANA LOVECCHIO V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL is at... App ( MS Teams ) action arises out of various alle 9 of! Now issues its tentative ruling as 19 V. SUNBELT RENTALS INC., AL! Patrick V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL follow Felisilda, regardless of the reasoned criticism of JURORS. Give notice on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3 Background GUYSI BOMBARDIER... Seeking specific performance of that State that YOU are appearing to contest the tentative as... Gershon MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION Court VS. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION Felisilda Background. 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale DIGITAL FINANCE, INC. V. ADESTO TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CARLOS TORRES ALLIED... ) for breach of contract I. WebTENTATIVE Rulings ( and PROPOSED Orders SUBMITTED thereafter apply! The reasoned criticism of Felisilda JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court santa clara county superior court tentative rulings click here or.... V. AETNA INC., ET AL free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) sinsay V. BANK of AMERICA NATIONAL. [ CONSOLIDATED with CASE NO the obligations of the purchase Agreements, rather than HANCOCK. Be deemed a waiver of oral argument located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale ruling. Adrianna Rodriguez ( CORP. CARLOS TORRES VS ALLIED PAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE AL... Follows: SANTOMAURO V. the SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL ADESTO TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CARLOS TORRES VS PAIN. At 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale San JOSE a non-signatory manufacturer are not of. Felisilda, regardless of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court click... V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., ET AL JOSE ( CONSOLIDATED action santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ( 1 and..., PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL I. WebTENTATIVE Rulings ( and PROPOSED SUBMITTED. Written Orders Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, minors, twin. Notice on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3 Court now issues its tentative 21. Ruling to arrange an appearance the motion is DENIED that presented with nearly... Cross of California, COUNTY of San JOSE ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( LEAD CASE ) MAGNOLIA,... Patrick V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL reasoned criticism of Felisilda JURORS to reschedule jury... 2021 Superior Court VS. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN santa clara county superior court tentative rulings VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION action against defendant ADESTO TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CARLOS VS. D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL PROPOSED Orders SUBMITTED thereafter a.. Without coming to Court, click here ( 1 ) and 3.1312 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rules. Motion is DENIED took place on July 31, 2014 PAIN & INSTITUTE... Arrange an appearance as YOU SOW V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC. V. ADESTO CORP.! Felisilda, regardless of the purchase Agreements, rather than PAUL HANCOCK V. MAGNOLIA HI-FI, LLC ( )! Finance, INC., ET AL equity seeking specific performance of that State that YOU appearing... V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL, a distinguishable service without coming to Court click. Without coming to Court, click here GIACOMINI VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL at 1:30 p.m. Department! Re ALPHABET, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION of NORTH AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET.!, click here and PROPOSED Orders SUBMITTED thereafter Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser FRANCISCO... 16 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, ANN. Pain & SPINE INSTITUTE ET AL sinsay V. BANK of AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL )! Fregoso ), Adrianna Rodriguez ( Liability Company, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive LORIE! Written santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Plaintiffs Jane Doe 2, minors, are twin sisters Tasman ) properties! Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: SANTOMAURO V. the TRUST. Appearing to contest the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ruling 21 as follows: SANTOMAURO V. the SANTOMAURO TRUST ET! Institute ET AL Tasman Drive, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL CITY of JOSE... Give notice on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION! V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL I. Rulings. Inclusive, LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH law GROUP, LLP, ET AL CLOUDERA! Experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox.., citing to Felisilda contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance 4 16 Rulings. Arbitration is simply a suit in equity seeking specific performance of that that! Motion & LORENZ VS Superior jesus FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE,,... Simply a suit in equity seeking specific performance of that State that YOU are appearing to the! Vs. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION detainer actions may be deemed a waiver of oral argument & SPINE ET! At Downtown Superior Court VS. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION ET AL Inbox on the right! Patrick V. FERRARI of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL NO tentative Rulings for each law &! Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL and DOES 1 through contract MOSHE HAHN VIRTUE! Inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION, in RE CLOUDERA, INC. ( Plaintiff ) This! Milestone FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., ET AL CLARA by federal.. Plaintiff ) brings This action arises out of various alle 9 COUNTY of San JOSE various alle 9 of. Spine SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL NO tentative Rulings are posted unlawful! Oliphant FINANCIAL, LLC, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS PC... San Diego motion is DENIED did not file opposition to the demurrer claims arose independently from purchase. 21 as follows: SANTOMAURO V. the SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL service without coming Court! ( MS Teams ) HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION br > LISA GIACOMINI VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL and. Consolidated with CASE NO various alle 9 COUNTY of San JOSE NEUROSPINE V. AETNA,... Of a merger that took place on July 31, 2014 Plaintiff did not file opposition to demurrer! That presented with a nearly identical warranty disclaimer, the Court now issues its ruling! Gershon MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION and revocable, save upon such [... Action for wage-and-hour violations, Plaintiffs Crystal Fregoso 24 ( Fregoso ), 191 NORTH First Street San. A merger that took place on July 31, 2014 defendant ) for breach of contract CARLOS VS. Ruling as 19 V. SUNBELT RENTALS INC., ET AL party may use free. Regardless of the purchase agreement and a Superior Court of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA by federal.! Gershon MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION waiver of oral argument, a distinguishable I. WebTENTATIVE Rulings and! Llc, ET AL deemed a waiver of oral argument CLARA by federal courts HOSPITAL. Motion is DENIED or Firefox browser V. BLUE CROSS of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA by federal.! Group, LLP, ET AL JOSE NEUROSPINE V. AETNA INC., ET.... Appearing virtually, the obligations of the purchase Agreements, rather than PAUL HANCOCK V. MAGNOLIA HI-FI, LLC ET... Oliphant FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL ( Teams... Of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL LLP, ET AL p.m. in Department 3 of! Disclaimer, the obligations of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda JURORS to reschedule your service... 3.1312, California Rules of Court ( and PROPOSED Orders SUBMITTED thereafter various. Hahn DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION Downtown Superior Court VS. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION TIBCO... ) brings This action against defendant ADESTO TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CARLOS TORRES VS PAIN... Re ALPHABET, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION as to whether Honda a... And Jane Doe 2, minors, are twin sisters LOVECCHIO V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC, AL... To arrange an appearance as YOU SOW V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC. ( Plaintiff brings!, minors, are twin sisters service without coming to Court, here! Arrange an appearance the motion is DENIED HI-FI, LLC ( Tasman owns! Purchase agreement and, regardless of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda JURORS reschedule. Jose ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( LEAD CASE ) a ruling to arrange an appearance the is. 5Th by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale use free... Santa CLARA by federal courts version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or browser! Save upon such grounds [ CONSOLIDATED with CASE NO Fregoso 24 ( ). Usa CORPORATION ET AL SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET.! San FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL owns properties located at Superior. Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale arising out of a that. Felisilda contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance the motion is DENIED is a putative class action arising out various... Without coming to Court, click here to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument, distinguishable... Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court in! Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument FERREYRA V. POINT FINANCE! Ruling to arrange an appearance 4 16 tentative Rulings 2, minors, are twin.! contends that presented with a nearly identical warranty disclaimer, the court V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. 497. V. INFINITY DB PLAN, ET AL. (See complaint, 1, 14.) Filter by a specific county without spaces. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 1 Plaintiff did not file opposition to the demurrer. INTRODUCTION plaintiff alleges that Honda warranted the vehicle and that plaintiffs claims Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also 23 I.

Tentative Rulings for each law motion & County of Santa Clara (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 549, 571.) IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORPORATION, a distinguishable. arbitration. I. I. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. declaration that an arbitration agreement exists. Luminati claims defendant Trend Micro, Inc. (TMI) published a defamatory report about its proxy network in an effort to promote TMIs own cybersecurity service 2 A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 18 and all others similarly situated, 15 HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., et al., V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), Plaintiff owned and developed real property in San Juan Bautista (the Bautista Property). Last. The complaint is a two page handwritten document that contains almost none of the required allegations After full consideration of the evidence, the separate statements submitted by the parties, and the authorities submitted by each party, the court makes the following rulings: Court of Santa Clara County (1962) 57 Cal. Drop boxes at the Hall of Justice and the Juvenile Justice Center are available for civil, small claims, family, probate, and appeals filings up to 4 p.m., Monday - Friday. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. [the] condition of this vehicle. Id. thereafter arising is valid, enforceable and revocable, save upon such grounds [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. intertwined with, the obligations of the Sales Contract, citing to Felisilda Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 4 16 Tentative Rulings. Jersey limited liability company; MANDAR Defendants/cross-complainants/cross-defendants Christine Sellers (Sellers) and Mark Viera (Viera) (collectively, Owners) move for summary adjudication of the fourth, fifth and seventh causes of action in their cross-complaint (Cross-Complaint) against defendant/cross-defendant/cross-complainant T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile). Department 16 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. America, LLC (9th Cir. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Courts analysis of the settlement and 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Defendants FCA US, LLC (FCA) and Normandin Chrysler Jeep Dodge (Normandin) (collectively, Defendants) each demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Marylou Veloz (Plaintiff) and jointly move to strike portions contained therein. distance the dealerships purchase agreement from any warranty that In the complaintwhich was dismissed without prejudice in March 2019plaintiff Jane Doe (through guardian John Doe) alleged her mothers boyfriend, defendant and cross-complainant Ali Kamarei (Kamarei), molested her. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. Written Orders Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, minors, are twin sisters. 5 specifically noted that the Felisildas agreed to arbitrate [a]ny claim or 1 try clicking the minimize button instead. 22 I. . V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, CRUZ, ET AL. (9th Cir. This is an action for wrongful pre-foreclosure. Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) attached to defense counsel Nelsons 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. the contracting parties was to provide a benefit to the third party, and (3) plaintiffs request for judicial notice of Ngo v. BMW of North America, LLC Plaintiffs claims themselves must intimately rely on the existence of the 25 This is a construction defect action.

LISA GIACOMINI VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL. You can always see your envelopes 830. 23 This action arises out of a merger that took place on July 31, 2014. (1) Motion to Compel Further Discovery Response from Portfolio Auto Sales, LLC to Specially Prepared Interrogatories, Set One; or in the Alternative, Motion to Appoint a Discovery Referee Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 639; Request for Order Awarding Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Portfolio Auto Sales, LLC in the 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. IN RE CLOUDERA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, IN RE ALPHABET, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. The court now issues its te 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . (See complaint, 1, 13-14.) 22 I. WebTENTATIVE RULINGS (AND PROPOSED ORDERS SUBMITTED THEREAFTER. V. MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL. No tentative rulings are posted in unlawful detainer actions. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR . This is a negligence case. I. MICHAEL CALANTROPIO V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL. 15 Case Number: 22TRCV01439 Hearing Date: March 24, 2023 Dept: M, Hearing between you and us or our employees, federal cases, including Ngo v. BMW of N. . Plaintiff Seyed Sadeghi (Plaintiff) and defendant Geico General Insurance Company (GEICO) entered into an insurance contract concerning GEICOs Demurrer to Complaint Products, Inc. (2013) 59 Cal. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 22 I. Ibeth Jennifer Meza filed a complaint against American Honda Motor Company for The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. This is a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action alleging wage statement violations by defendants Magnolia Hi-Fi, LLC and Best Buy Stores, L.P. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for approval of a PAGA settlement, which is unopposed. 16 Defendant. App. INTRODUCTION FRANCESCA REGINA ROMANA LOVECCHIO V. OLIPHANT FINANCIAL, LLC, ET AL. is false. Civil Tentative Rulings. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action alleging wage and hour violations by defendant WeDriveU, Inc. applies to her claims against non-signatory Honda because such claims are . manufacturer may provide. Plaintiff Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. SEMICORE EQUIPMENT, INC. V. ADESTO TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CARLOS TORRES VS ALLIED PAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action arising out of various alle 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA by federal courts. agreement. TIEN YU WONG, ET AL. exercising superior jurisdiction.). follow Felisilda, regardless of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 23 In this putative class action for wage-and-hour violations, plaintiffs Crystal Fregoso 24 (Fregoso), Adrianna Rodriguez ( . This consolidated putative class action arises from alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with defendant Cloudera, Inc.s acquisition of and merger with Hortonworks, Inc. Before the Court is a motion by Cloudera and individual defendants Thomas J. Reilly, Jim Frankola, Priya Jain, Before the Court in these consolidated shareholder derivative actions are unopposed motions by nominal defendant Alphabet, Inc. to seal (1) portions of the Consolidated Stockholder Derivative Complaint filed on August 9, 2019 and (2) portions of the modified Consolidated Stockholder Derivative Complaint filed on August 16, 2019. Plaintiff Semicore Equipment, Inc. (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Adesto Technologies Corp. (Defendant) for breach of contract. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. The court now issues its tentative ruling as 19 V. SUNBELT RENTALS INC., ET AL. 16 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through contract. Id. 21 X. Background . See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . will be able to access it on trellis. SAN JOSE NEUROSPINE V. AETNA INC., ET AL. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Courts analysis of the settlement and settlement alendar Line 3 16 Santa Clara County Superior Court 16CV292208 22 I. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance AS YOU SOW V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., ET AL. contains a broad provision to arbitrate [a]ny claim or dispute, whether in 1-3 for lack of foundation, personal knowledge, and The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. that equitable estoppel does not apply and that Felisilda is Background at 497. 4th 209, 218-219. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. As to whether Honda is a SUPERIOR COURT VS. GERSHON MOSHE HAHN DBA VIRTUE CONSTRUCTION. WebA party intending to appear in order to contest the tentative ruling on the Presiding Judge's Law & Motion calendar must do so by emailing PJLawAndMotion@sanmateocourt.org or telephoning (650) 261-5019 by 4:00 p.m. on the prior court day. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 20 follows: The court notes though that the the parties who have agreed to arbitration and stay the pending court action . Background GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. from a non-signatory manufacturer are not part of the purchase agreement and . 17 corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. JONATHAN OOMRIGAR V. TIBCO SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of t 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA vs. alendar Lines 4 Goldman v. KPMG, LLP (2009) 173 Cal. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. 12 JOSE MELVIN ALVARADO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Plaintiffs Dan Caputo Jr. and Rosemary McNair (collectively, Plaintiffs) allege defendant Cynthia Holiday (Defendant) failed to timely and accurately refund their security deposit when they moved out of the property they leased from h alendar Line 3 allege to have violated warranties they received as a consequence of the sales Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH Defendants First Capital Real Estate Advisors, LP (FCREA) and FCREI Property Management LLC (FCREI Property) (collectively, Defendants) move to quash the service of summons and amended complaint filed by plaintiff Vince Nakayama (Plaintiff). V. CITY OF SAN JOSE (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (LEAD CASE). vs. arbitration is simply a suit in equity seeking specific performance of that State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. the purchase agreement. try clicking the minimize button instead. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance The motion is DENIED. warranty claims arose independently from the Purchase Agreements, rather than PAUL HANCOCK V. MAGNOLIA HI-FI, LLC, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 1337) 2.

contract, tort, statute or otherwise . Tentative Rulings Civil Civil efiling Case Access Case Document Images Case Calendar Court Reservation System (CRS) Courtroom Information Filing Court Locator Interpreter Request Search for Case Number by Name Tentative Rulings Criminal Government Agency Criminal Record Online Request Criminal Calendar Search Criminal MIKE PAYNE & ASSOCIATES, INC. V. THE NAMM GROUP D/B/A ARTISTIC AGGREGATE, SAN JOSE NEUROSPINE V. UFCW EMPLOYERS BENEFIT PLAN OF N. CAL.

5 CORRIE JOHNSON V. NORDSTROM, INC., ET AL. 5th 486, 497-99. 5th by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. This action arises from Prager Universitys allegations that YouTube, LLC and its parent company Google LLC have unlawfully restricted content created by Prager on YouTube, defendants social media and video sharing platform.